Table 2 |
|||||||
|
Distribution of orthogroups with phyletic patterns supporting early eukaryotic duplication |
|||||||
|
Dataset |
Method |
Support |
(RO)(RO) |
(RO)(R) |
(RO)(O) |
Othera |
Total |
|
|
|||||||
|
Analysis I |
NJ-BSb |
≥ 50% |
73 (36.7%) |
56 (28.1%) |
59 (29.6%) |
11 (5.5%) |
199 |
|
≥ 70% |
52 (39.7%) |
31 (23.7%) |
34 (26.0%) |
14 (10.7%) |
131 |
||
|
ML-BS |
≥ 50% |
71 (39.2%) |
55 (30.4%) |
46 (25.4%) |
9 (5.0%) |
181 |
|
|
≥ 70% |
46 (41.4%) |
29 (26.1%) |
21 (18.9%) |
15 (13.5%) |
111 |
||
|
ML-aLRTc |
≥ 50% |
102 (41.1%) |
75 (30.2%) |
64 (25.8%) |
7 (2.8%) |
248 |
|
|
≥ 70% |
95 (40.9%) |
63 (27.2%) |
62 (26.7%) |
12 (5.2%) |
232 |
||
|
Analysis III |
NJ-BS |
≥ 50% |
90 (30.9%) |
72 (24.7%) |
94 (32.3%) |
35 (12.0%) |
291 |
|
≥ 70% |
40 (26.3%) |
41 (27.0%) |
41 (27.0%) |
30 (19.7%) |
152 |
||
|
ML-BS |
≥ 50% |
92 (33.9%) |
80 (29.5%) |
62 (22.9%) |
37 (13.7%) |
271 |
|
|
≥ 70% |
39 (30.2%) |
33 (25.6%) |
22 (17.1%) |
35 (27.1%) |
129 |
||
|
ML-aLRT |
≥ 50% |
299 (48.3%) |
156 (25.2%) |
156 (25.2%) |
8 (1.3%) |
619 |
|
|
≥ 70% |
268 (46.4%) |
136 (23.6%) |
150 (26.0%) |
23 (4.0%) |
577 |
||
|
|
|||||||
|
aAll the orthogroups for which the pattern of retention of duplicates cannot be explicitly determined are assigned to the 'Other' category. bBS, bootstrap test. caLRT, approximate likelihood-ratio test. R, Archaeplastida; O, Opisthokonta; (RO)(RO), both duplicates were retained in plants and animals/fungi; (RO)(O), one of the duplicates was lost in plants; (RO)(R), one of the duplicates was lost in animals/fungi. |
|||||||
|
Zhou et al. Genome Biology 2010 11:R38 doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-4-r38 |
|||||||
