Table 1 |
||||||
|
Protein domain gains and loss comparison between lophotrochozoans and ecdysozoans |
||||||
|
Ancestor domains |
Extant domains |
|||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
Gains |
Losses |
Present |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Genomes analyzed |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Lophotrochozoans |
16 |
545 |
4,215 |
3,605 |
320 |
3 |
|
Annelids |
16 |
721 |
4,039 |
3,602 |
393 |
2 |
|
Ecdysozoans |
24 |
736 |
4,032 |
3,202 |
190 |
12 |
|
Arthropods |
38 |
864 |
3,918 |
3,256 |
172 |
9 |
|
Nematodes |
39 |
1,477 |
3,306 |
3,039 |
143 |
3 |
|
|
||||||
|
In this table, gains and losses are relative to the last common ancestor of deuterostomes and protostomes, the Urbilateria. For the calculation of extant domain statistics, data from parasitic species is omitted (the nematode Brugia malayi and the flatworm Schistosoma mansoni). |
||||||
|
Zmasek and Godzik Genome Biology 2011 12:R4 doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-1-r4 |
||||||