Table 2 |
||||||
|
Correlations and partial correlations between growth rate, habitat type and global codon usage bias |
||||||
|
Growth rate and habitat type |
Growth rate and codon usage bias |
Habitat type and codon usage bias |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
r |
P |
r |
P |
r |
P |
|
|
Analysis A |
||||||
|
Correlation |
0.1995 |
0.0723 |
0.3451 |
0.0015 |
0.4619 |
1.2538E-5 |
|
Partial correlation |
0.0482a |
0.6693a |
0.291b |
0.0084b |
0.4274c |
6.919E-5c |
|
Analysis B |
||||||
|
Correlation |
0.0368 |
0.8645 |
0.2971 |
0.1586 |
0.4692 |
0.0207 |
|
Partial correlation |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
0.4802c |
0.0204c |
|
|
||||||
|
Analysis A was based on 82 organisms; analysis B was based on a subset of 24 organisms, which are phylogentically remote from each other. Pearson correlation coefficients were computed. aControlling for codon usage bias; bcontrolling for habitat type; ccontrolling for growth rate. NA, when the Pearson correlation coefficient was not statistically significant, partial correlation was not computed. |
||||||
|
Botzman and Margalit Genome Biology 2011 12:R109 doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-10-r109 |
||||||