Table 1 |
||||||||
|
Direct comparison of coverage statistics from exome re-sequencing (2 × 40 bp, Illumina) of four inbred strains with two exome probe pool designs, alpha and beta |
||||||||
|
Sample |
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
C57BL/6J |
C57BL/6J |
129S1/SvImJ |
129S1/SvImJ |
BALB/cJ |
BALB/cJ |
C3H/HeJ |
C3H/HeJ |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Exome version |
Alpha |
Beta |
Alpha |
Beta |
Alpha |
Beta |
Alpha |
Beta |
|
Quantitative PCR |
161.81 |
168.53 |
129.43 |
95.75 |
168.92 |
165.08 |
168.38 |
92.00 |
|
Target exons |
203,225 |
203,224 |
203,225 |
203,224 |
203,225 |
203,224 |
203,225 |
203,224 |
|
Target bases |
54,367,346 |
54,367,244 |
54,367,346 |
54,367,244 |
54,367,346 |
54,367,244 |
54,367,346 |
54,367,244 |
|
Target bases covered |
52,266,238 |
53,273,874 |
51,746,839 |
52,508,881 |
51,828,334 |
52,862,662 |
52,136,965 |
51,460,949 |
|
Percentage target bases covered |
96.14 |
97.99 |
95.18 |
96.58 |
95.33 |
97.23 |
95.90 |
94.65 |
|
Target bases not covered |
2,101,108 |
1,093,370 |
2,620,507 |
1,858,363 |
2,539,012 |
1,504,582 |
2,230,381 |
2,906,295 |
|
Percentage target bases not covered |
3.86 |
2.01 |
4.82 |
3.42 |
4.67 |
2.77 |
4.10 |
5.35 |
|
Median coverage |
18.45 |
20.74 |
17.93 |
16.37 |
18.05 |
20.75 |
18.76 |
7.86 |
|
Total reads |
60,582,097 |
60,207,746 |
64,258,556 |
44,434,168 |
64,495,816 |
63,740,186 |
64,959,026 |
25,760,946 |
|
NC80 |
0.28 |
0.37 |
0.25 |
0.33 |
0.25 |
0.31 |
0.29 |
0.32 |
|
1/NC80 |
3.53 |
2.71 |
4.03 |
3.02 |
3.96 |
3.27 |
3.50 |
3.13 |
|
|
||||||||
|
1/NC80 is the fold 80 penalty, which represents the fold of over-sequencing necessary to move 80% of the below median bases to median. |
||||||||
|
Fairfield et al. Genome Biology 2011 12:R86 doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-9-r86 |
||||||||