Table 3 |
||||
|
Gene essentiality in models 1 and 3 at two threshold ratios (the highest percentage achieved for each prediction metric appears in bold) |
||||
|
Model 1 [13] |
Model 3 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
Predictions in |
Threshold 0.1 |
Threshold 0.2 |
Threshold 0.1 |
Threshold 0.2 |
|
|
||||
|
True positive |
106 |
139 |
49 |
63 |
|
False positive |
97 |
64 |
40 |
26 |
|
True negative |
325 |
285 |
508 |
436 |
|
False negative |
56 |
96 |
129 |
201 |
|
Positive predictive value (%) |
52 |
68 |
55 |
71 |
|
Negative predictive value (%) |
85 |
75 |
80 |
68 |
|
Correct predictions (%) |
74 |
73 |
77 |
69 |
|
|
||||
|
Chindelevitch et al. Genome Biology 2012 13:r6 doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-1-r6 |
||||
