|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 2.
Telomere analysis using whole-genome sequencing data of 235 pediatric cancers. (a) Bayesian information criterion (BIC) guided clustering, which divided the ΔT values
in this cohort into two clusters with equal variance. The boundary of these clusters
is marked in dark blue. Using 0.01 as the threshold for significance, we defined the
lower and upper boundary of ΔT as 'gain' or 'loss' of telomeric DNA. Samples that
fall within these boundaries are deemed to have 'no change' in telomere status. (b) The number of structural variations in tumors with 'gain', 'loss' or 'no change' of
telomere status. Tumors with ΔT gains have significantly higher number of structural
variations compared with the other two groups (Mann-Whitney P = 1.07e-10; brain tumors P = 0.013, solid tumors P = 0.0002, hematopoietic malignancies P = NA (Not Applicable - no telomeric content gains detected); M, median). (c) The number of non-silent mutations in tumors with 'gain', 'loss' or 'no change' of
telomere status. Tumors with ΔT gains have significantly higher number of sequence
mutations compared with the other two groups (Mann-Whitney P = 3.723e-07; brain tumors P = 0.061; solid tumors P = 0.013, hematopoietic malignancies P = NA; M, median). (d) ΔT values from 235 pediatric cancers. The dotted lines correspond to the lower and
upper boundary of ΔT as 'gain' or 'loss'. CBF, core-binding factor ALL; HYPO, hypodiploid
ALL; INF, infant ALL; TALL, ETP-ALL; EPD, ependymoma; HGG, high-grade glioma; LGG,
low-grade glioma; MB, medulloblastoma, ACT, adrenocortical carcinoma; NBL, neuroblastoma;
OS, osteosarcoma; RB, retinoblastoma; RHB, rhabdomyosarcoma.
Parker et al. Genome Biology 2012 13:R113 doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-12-r113 |