Table 3 |
|||||
|
Training and base calling time for Ibis and AYB. |
|||||
|
Ibis |
AYB |
||||
|
Training |
Base calling |
Total |
Base calling |
Δ% |
|
|
|
|||||
|
ϕX174 L2 |
68 |
2 |
70 |
12 |
-83 |
|
ϕX174 L4 |
121 |
4 |
125 |
21 |
-83 |
|
ϕX174 L6 |
114 |
3 |
117 |
15 |
-87 |
|
Ibis Test |
6 |
4 |
10 |
1 |
-90 |
|
B. pert./1 |
21 |
13 |
34 |
119 |
+250 |
|
B. pert./2 |
33 |
21 |
54 |
163 |
+202 |
|
BGI/1 |
126 |
17 |
143 |
96 |
-32 |
|
BGI/2 |
117 |
29 |
146 |
96 |
-34 |
|
Illumina/1 |
136 |
27 |
163 |
196 |
+20 |
|
Illumina/2 |
136 |
41 |
177 |
197 |
+11 |
|
HiSeq/1 |
94 |
34 |
128 |
276 |
+116 |
|
HiSeq/2 |
† |
274 |
|||
|
|
|||||
|
AYB does not require training, so only base calling time is reported. The Δ% figure for AYB is the percentage difference compared to the Ibis total time. All times are the real time, in minutes, running on four cores of an Intel Xeon L5420 running at 2.5 GHz. †Ibis failed to train on the second end of the HiSeq data so no time is reported. |
|||||
|
Massingham and Goldman Genome Biology 2012 13:R13 doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-2-r13 |
|||||
