#suppress_mobile_home()
Table 3 |
||||
|
Computing the TFe Article Completion Score |
||||
|
Tab |
Scoring element |
Target |
Points |
Weight |
|
|
||||
|
Summary |
Overview text |
500 words |
10 points |
8.333% |
|
Summary |
References in overview text |
3 references |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
Summary |
Figures |
1 figure |
10 points |
8.333% |
|
Structure |
Overview text |
200 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
TFBS |
Overview text |
150 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
TFBS |
Binding site profiles |
1 binding site profile |
10 points |
8.333% |
|
Targets |
Overview text |
200 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
Targets |
Targets |
10 targets in total (both author and auto) |
10 points |
8.333% |
|
Protein |
Isoforms text |
200 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
Protein |
Covalent modifications text |
200 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
Interactions |
Overview text |
200 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
Interactions |
Ligands |
1 ligand |
1 point |
0.833% |
|
Interactions |
Interactions |
10 interactors in total (both author and auto) |
10 points |
8.333% |
|
Interactions |
Interactions |
All 'nature of interaction' fields annotated |
10 points |
8.333% |
|
Genetics |
Overview text |
250 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
Expression |
Overview text |
200 words |
5 points |
4.167% |
|
Papers |
Papers |
15 papers |
10 points |
8.333% |
|
Papers |
Papers |
3 papers marked as 'recommended' |
3 points |
2.500% |
|
(all) |
Links |
1 link |
1 point |
0.833% |
|
120 points |
100% |
|||
|
|
||||
|
The TFe Article Completion Score (ACS) is based on the 19 components listed here. Authors earn points for completing each component, up to the prescribed maximum for that component ('Maximum points'). So, for example, an author would be granted one point for adding one link, but no additional points would be granted if the author adds a second or third link. This prevents the author from adding 24 links to boost their ACS score by 20%. A 'fully complete' article would net 120 points, which gives a score of 100%. |
||||
|
Yusuf et al. Genome Biology 2012 13:R24 doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-3-r24 |
||||