#suppress_mobile_home()
|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 6.
Comparison of the prediction accuracy of high- and low-CpG content promoter gene categories. (a) Summary of prediction accuracy for all high-CpG content promoter (HCP) genes in 78
RNA expression experiments on whole cell, cytosolic or nuclear RNA, showing that the
median correlation for all experiments is r = 0.8. Each bar is divided into different colors corresponding to the relative contribution
of variables in the regression model. (b) Same as in (a), but for low-CpG content promoter (LCP) genes, showing that the median
correlation coefficient for all experiments is r = 0.66. This indicates that HCP genes are better predicted than LCP genes. Comparison
of the relative contribution of various chromatin features in each experiment indicates
that the promoter marks (red and light red) show more importance in predicting LCP
genes using TSS-based data (for example, CAGE and RNA-PET), while structural marks
(green show most importance in predicting LCP genes for transcript-based data. Code
for cell lines: K, K562; G, GM12878; 1, H1-hESC; H, HepG2; E, HeLa-S3; N, NHEK; U,
HUVEC. Code for RNA extraction: +, PolyA+; -, PolyA-. Code for cell compartment: W,
whole cell; C, cytosol; N, nucleus.
Dong et al. Genome Biology 2012 13:R53 doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-9-r53 |