#suppress_mobile_home()
|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 2.
A sequencing context breakdown of the empirical insertion error rate of the two platforms
on NA12878 whole genome data. In this figure we show all contexts of size 8 that start with AAAAA. The empirical
insertion quality score (y-axis) is PHRED scaled. Despite the higher error rate (approximately Q12) of the PacBio
RS instrument, the error is independent of the sequencing context. Other platforms
are known to have different error rates for different sequencing contexts. Illumina's
HiSeq platform, shown here, has a lower error rate (approximately Q45 across eight
independent runs), but contexts such as AAAAAAAA and AAAAACAG have extremely different
error rates (Q30 versus Q55). This context-specific error rate creates bias that is
not easily clarified by greater sequencing depth. Empirical insertion error rates
were measured using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) - Base Quality Score Recalibration
tool.
Roberts et al. Genome Biology 2013 14:405 doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-405 |