Table 1 |
||||||||||||
|
Pairwise differences between maize breeding programs in the USA.a |
||||||||||||
|
IL |
IN |
IA |
MI |
MN |
MO |
NE |
NC |
ND |
W |
Mon |
Pion |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Illinois (IL) |
0.14 0.96 |
0.14 0.99 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.14 0.97 |
0.15 0.98 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.15 0.93 |
0.15 0.98 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.14 0.95 |
|
|
Indiana (IN) |
0.01 |
0.14 0.99 |
0.14 0.95 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.15 0.99 |
0.14 0.96 |
0.14 0.96 |
0.15 0.92 |
0.15 0.96 |
0.14 0.96 |
0.14 0.96 |
|
|
Iowa (IA) |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.14 0.93 |
0.14 0.99 |
0.15 0.99 |
0.13 0.99 |
0.14 1.00 |
0.15 0.99 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.13 0.99 |
0.14 0.96 |
|
|
Michigan (MI) |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.14 0.97 |
0.15 0.93 |
0.14 0.91 |
0.15 0.91 |
0.15 0.93 |
0.15 0.97 |
0.14 0.95 |
0.14 0.92 |
|
|
Minnesota (MN) |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.15 0.96 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.15 0.99 |
0.15 0.94 |
0.14 0.99 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.14 0.95 |
|
|
Missouri (MO) |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.14 0.97 |
0.15 0.95 |
0.15 0.92 |
0.15 0.99 |
0.14 0.99 |
0.14 0.96 |
|
|
Nebraska (NE) |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.14 0.99 |
0.15 0.89 |
0.14 0.97 |
0.13 0.98 |
0.13 0.95 |
|
|
North Carolina (NC) |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.15 0.90 |
0.15 0.93 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.14 0.95 |
|
|
North Dakota (ND) |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.08 |
0.06 |
0.15 0.94 |
0.15 0.94 |
0.15 0.88 |
|
|
Wisconsin (WI) |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.07 |
0.07 |
0.03 |
0.14 0.98 |
0.15 0.94 |
|
|
Monsanto (Mon) |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.13 0.99 |
|
|
Pioneer (Pion) |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.05 |
0.04 |
0.04 |
0.06 |
0.06 |
0.07 |
0.06 |
0.03 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
aLower diagonal shows pairwise Fst estimates between USA breeding programs, whereas upper diagonal shows average nucleotide divergence and maximum nucleotide similarity. |
||||||||||||
|
Romay et al. Genome Biology 2013 14:R55 doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r55 |
||||||||||||
