|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 6.
Examples of sequence alignments of contig fragments containing DownCNV/PAVs. The sequence of the barley cultivar Morex is shown at the top and the sequence of
cultivar Barke at the bottom. (A) Schematic representation of how an insertion in Barke can lead to a DownCNV/PAV
call. Sequence regions that are orthologous are connected by shaded areas. The additional
sequence in Barke is depicted in light blue. The full contig fragment is composed
of 10 overlapping probes. Those probes which overlap the breakpoint of the insertion
will produce a low intensity signals or no signals, resulting in a reduced overall
signal of the targeted contig fragment. (B) Contig fragments with multiple insertions/deletions. (C) Contig fragment with multiple deletions, including one that expands past the border
of the fragment. (D) Contig fragment that contains additional sequences in Barke. (E) Contig fragment that contains an insertion/deletion that most likely originates
from template slippage. The numbers in circles identify different types of insertions/deletions:
1, insertion/deletion that contains no obvious signature; 2, insertion/deletion that
shows a typical signature of double-strand break repair via single-strand annealing
(SSA); 3, insertion/deletion which contains filler sequence (indicated by a curly
bracket) and that presumably is the result of DSB repair via synthesis-dependent strand
annealing (SDSA); 4, insertion/deletion originated from template slippage of direct
repeats (indicated by arrows).
Muñoz-Amatriaín et al. Genome Biology 2013 14:R58 doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r58 |