Table 2

Enrichment^a of genes functionally classified as 'transcriptional regulation'^b among genes that show priming-induced differences in H3K4me3 or H3K27me3

Modification

Sequence^c

Background^d

Count^e

%^f

Fold enrichment^g

P value^h

H3K4me3

Gene + 1,000 bp

Islands Primed

129

8.86

1.98

4.97E-14

Islands Control

127

8.72

2

4.32E-14

Arabidopsis

129

8.86

2.02

2.85E-14

Gene + 100 bp

Islands Primed

127

8.78

1.97

1.15E-13

Islands Control

123

8.51

1.96

3.63E-13

Arabidopsis

129

8.92

2.04

1.73E-14

H3K27me3

Gene + 1,000 bp

Islands Primed

130

4.33

2.4

4.60E-21

Islands Control

139

4.63

1.4

5.05E-06

Arabidopsis

238

7.94

1.83

3.88E-21

Gene + 100 bp

Islands Primed

124

4.65

1.42

4.25E-06

Islands Control

76

2.85

1.43

4.74E-04

Arabidopsis

258

9.68

2.25

7.03E-37

^aAs determined by DAVID [40]. For full dataset see Additional file 2.

^bTerm from SP PIR KEYWORDS.

^cLength of up- and downstream sequences included in the mapping of islands and differences to genes.

^dBackground list used for identification of enriched functional terms in submitted gene list.

^eNumber of genes matching the annotation term in submitted gene list.

^fPercentage of all genes in the submitted gene list.

^gRelative enrichment compared to percentage in background.

^hStatistical significance of enrichment.

Sani et al. Genome Biology 2013 14:R59   doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r59