Table 2

Enrichmenta of genes functionally classified as 'transcriptional regulation'b among genes that show priming-induced differences in H3K4me3 or H3K27me3

Modification

Sequencec

Backgroundd

Counte

%f

Fold enrichmentg

P valueh


H3K4me3

Gene + 1,000 bp

Islands Primed

129

8.86

1.98

4.97E-14

Islands Control

127

8.72

2

4.32E-14

Arabidopsis

129

8.86

2.02

2.85E-14

Gene + 100 bp

Islands Primed

127

8.78

1.97

1.15E-13

Islands Control

123

8.51

1.96

3.63E-13

Arabidopsis

129

8.92

2.04

1.73E-14


H3K27me3

Gene + 1,000 bp

Islands Primed

130

4.33

2.4

4.60E-21

Islands Control

139

4.63

1.4

5.05E-06

Arabidopsis

238

7.94

1.83

3.88E-21

Gene + 100 bp

Islands Primed

124

4.65

1.42

4.25E-06

Islands Control

76

2.85

1.43

4.74E-04

Arabidopsis

258

9.68

2.25

7.03E-37


aAs determined by DAVID [40]. For full dataset see Additional file 2.

bTerm from SP PIR KEYWORDS.

cLength of up- and downstream sequences included in the mapping of islands and differences to genes.

dBackground list used for identification of enriched functional terms in submitted gene list.

eNumber of genes matching the annotation term in submitted gene list.

fPercentage of all genes in the submitted gene list.

gRelative enrichment compared to percentage in background.

hStatistical significance of enrichment.

Sani et al. Genome Biology 2013 14:R59   doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r59

Open Data