Table 4 |
||
|
Functional annotation of the predicted proteome from the N. |
||
|
N. sylvestris merged |
N. tomentosiformis merged |
|
|
|
||
|
Unique IDs |
38,940 |
38,648 |
|
EC numbers |
||
|
Any EC assignment |
12,220 |
11,951 |
|
3×EC assignments |
7,793 |
7,611 |
|
... to unique proteins |
7,554 |
7,397 |
|
3×EC assignments HC |
4,117 |
4,069 |
|
...to unique proteins |
4,061 |
4,008 |
|
Unique 3×EC numbers |
148 |
150 |
|
4×EC assignments |
4,427 |
4,340 |
|
...to unique proteins |
4,203 |
4,120 |
|
4×EC assignments HC |
3,096 |
3,120 |
|
...to unique proteins |
2,989 |
3,007 |
|
Unique 4×EC |
635 |
635 |
|
GO terms |
||
|
Unique protein IDs |
22,497 |
22,196 |
|
Unique protein IDs with a molecular function |
19,852 |
19,551 |
|
Biological process |
48,896 |
48,365 |
|
Molecular function |
24,680 |
24,136 |
|
Cellular component |
8,414 |
8,419 |
|
|
||
|
sylvestris and N. tomentosiformis assemblies EFICAz2.5 was used to assign Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers and InterProScan was used to assign GO terms assignments to the ORFs derived from the assemblies. HC, high confidence. |
||
|
Sierro et al. Genome Biology 2013 14:R60 doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-6-r60 |
||
