#suppress_mobile_home()
|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 1.
High-throughput methylation comparison between monocytes (MOs) and derived osteoclasts
(OCs). (A) Heatmap including the data for three paired samples of MOs (MO D1, D2, D3) and their
derived OCs (OC D1, D2, D3) harvested on day 21. The heatmap includes all CpG-containing
probes displaying significant methylation changes (8,028 in total with FC ≥2 or FC
≤0.5; P ≤0.01 and FDR ≤0.05) (Additional file 2). Scale shown at the bottom, whereby beta values (that is, the ratio of the methylated
probe intensity to the overall intensity, where overall intensity is the sum of methylated
and unmethylated probe intensities) ranging from 0 (unmethylated, blue) to 1 (completely
methylated, red). (B) Scatterplot showing the mean methylation profile of three matching MO/OC pairs. Genes
with significant differences (FC >2, FDR <0.05) in averaged results from the three
pairs of samples are highlighted in red (hypermethylated) or blue (hypomethylated).
(C) Distribution of differentially methylated CpGs among genomic regions (promoter, gene
bodies, 3′UTR, and intergenic) in different subsets of CpGs (hypomethylated, hypermethylated).
(D) Gene ontology enrichment analysis of hypomethylated and hypermethylated CpGs showing
the most important categories. (E) Technical validation of the array data by bisulfite pyrosequencing of modified DNA.
BS pyrosequencing of three representative hypomethylated genes (ACP5, CTSK, and TM7SF4) and one hypermethylated gene (CX3CR1) from the array data are shown. A representation showing the excellent correlation
between array data (beta values) and pyrosequencing data (% methylation) including
the data for the four genes (right panel). (F) Cluster analysis of contiguous differentially methylated regions (<500 bp). Two examples
of regions with more than nine consecutive CpGs differentially methylated are shown.
(G) Analysis of methylation levels in repetitive elements (Sat2, D4Z4, NBL2) and ribosomal
RNA genes (18S and 28S regions) as obtained from bisulfite sequencing analysis.
de la Rica et al. Genome Biology 2013 14:R99 doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-9-r99 |