<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>gb-spotlight-20010405-02</ui>
   <ji>GBJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research news</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Are SNPs useful?</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Weitzman</snm>
               <mi>B</mi>
               <fnm>Jonathan</fnm>
               <email>jonathanweitzman@hotmail.com</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <source>Genome Biology</source>
         <issn>1465-6906</issn>
         <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
         <volume>2</volume>
         <fpage>spotlight-20010405-02</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/gb-spotlight-20010405-02</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>05</day>
               <month>04</month>
               <year>2001</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2001</year>
         <collab>BioMed Central Ltd</collab>
      </cpyrt>
      <shortabs>
         <p>A pooled DNA sequencing approach confirms the utility of candidate SNPs in the public database. </p>
      </shortabs>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification type="STATUS">Archive</classification>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p/>
         </st>
         <p>In the April <abbr bid="B1"><it>Nature Genetics</it></abbr>, Marth <it>et al</it>. ask the question how useful are the single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) available in the public-access databases (<it>Nature Genetics</it> 2001, <b>27:</b>371-372). The public database <abbr bid="B2">dbSNP</abbr> currently holds over 2.8 million SNPs, but as few as 15% have been proven to be genuinely polymorphic. Marth <it>et al</it>. performed two pilot studies to test the genetic utility of candidate SNPs. They analysed over 1200 candidate SNPs and tested their frequency in three ethnic groups (Caucasian, Chinese and African) using a <abbr bid="B3">pooled DNA sequencing</abbr> approach. Almost 80% of the candidates were found to be polymorphic. And about half of the SNPs were common within the three populations (with a minor allele frequency of >20%). Hence SNPs within the dbSNP database can be used with a high degree of confidence that they will be informative.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <url>http://genetics.nature.com</url>
            <note>
               <it>Nature Genetics</it>
            </note>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP</url>
            <note>dbSNP</note>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <note>Comparative analysis of human DNA variations by fluorescence-based sequencing of PCR products.</note>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7829062</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
