<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>gb-spotlight-20010621-01</ui>
   <ji>GBJ</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research news</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>No horitzontal transfer</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1">
               <snm>Weitzman</snm>
               <mi>B</mi>
               <fnm>Jonathan</fnm>
               <email>jonathanweitzman@hotmail.com</email>
            </au>
         </aug>
         <source>Genome Biology</source>
         <issn>1465-6906</issn>
         <pubdate>2001</pubdate>
         <volume>2</volume>
         <fpage>spotlight-20010621-01</fpage>
         <xrefbib>
            <pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/gb-spotlight-20010621-01</pubid>
         </xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history>
         <pub>
            <date>
               <day>21</day>
               <month>06</month>
               <year>2001</year>
            </date>
         </pub>
      </history>
      <cpyrt>
         <year>2001</year>
         <collab>BioMed Central Ltd</collab>
      </cpyrt>
      <shortabs>
         <p>Phylogenetic analysis refutes previous suggestions that there was extensive horizontal gene transfer from bacteria to vertebrates.</p>
      </shortabs>
   </fm>
   <meta>
      <classifications>
         <classification type="STATUS">Archive</classification>
      </classifications>
   </meta>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p/>
         </st>
         <p>The suggestion that the <abbr bid="B1">human genome sequence</abbr> contains as many as 113 cases of <abbr bid="B2">horizontal gene transfer</abbr> (HGT) from bacteria sparked much debate and <abbr bid="B3">speculation</abbr>. In the June 21 <abbr bid="B4"><it>Nature</it></abbr>, Stanhope <it>et al.</it> present phylogenetic analysis that lead them to conclude that there was probably no direct HGT from bacteria to vertebrates (<it>Nature</it> 2001, <b>411:</b>940-944). They studied 28 examples of proposed HGT genes. Orthologs of some HGT candidates, such as several <it>Dictyostelium</it> genes, were found in non-vertebrate eukaryote <abbr bid="B5">EST databases</abbr>. The authors suggest that a more accurate explanation is that vertebrates and bacteria share these loci through common ancestry, involving a succession of non-vertebrate eukaryote intermediates. They stress that phylogenetic analysis, rather than the ranking of results from database homology searches, should be a strict criterion for assessing genome evolution.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <refgrp>
         <bibl id="B1">
            <note>Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.</note>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11237011</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B2">
            <note>Genes lost and genes found: evolution of bacterial pathogenesis and symbiosis.</note>
            <xrefbib>
               <pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11352062</pubid>
            </xrefbib>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B3">
            <url>http://www.genomebiology.com/spotlights/articles/SpotlightCompiler.asp?xml=20010518-1.xml&amp;Status=Archive</url>
            <note>Bugs in the genome</note>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B4">
            <url>http://www.nature.com</url>
            <note>
               <it>Nature </it>
            </note>
         </bibl>
         <bibl id="B5">
            <url>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST</url>
            <note>BLAST</note>
         </bibl>
      </refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>
