Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
Assessing the impact of comparative genomic sequence data on the functional annotation of the Drosophila genome.
Bergman CM, Pfeiffer BD, Rincón-Limas DE, Hoskins RA, Gnirke A, Mungall CJ, Wang AM, Kronmiller B, Pacleb J, Park S, Stapleton M, Wan K, George RA, de Jong PJ, Botas J, Rubin GM, Celniker SE
Genome Biol 2002, 3: RESEARCH0086
[Full text] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

printer friendly 
to  [Help]

BioMed Central articles that cite the above article:

1.
36%36%
Research article    
Complex organizational structure of the genome revealed by genome-wide analysis of single and alternative promoters in Drosophila melanogaster
Zhu Q, Halfon MS
BMC Genomics 2009, 10: 9
(7 January 2009)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]
2.
36%36%
Research    
Identification of novel regulatory factor X (RFX) target genes by comparative genomics in Drosophila species
Laurençon A, Dubruille R, Efimenko E, Grenier G, Bissett R, Cortier E, Rolland V, Swoboda P, Durand B
Genome Biology 2007, 8(9):R195
(17 September 2007)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]
3.
36%36%
Research    
Extensive parallelism in protein evolution
Bazykin GA, Kondrashov FA, Brudno M, Poliakov A, Dubchak I, Kondrashov AS
Biology Direct 2007, 2: 20
(16 August 2007)
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
4.
36%36%
Research    
Large-scale analysis of transcriptional cis-regulatory modules reveals both common features and distinct subclasses
Li L, Zhu Q, He X, Sinha S, Halfon MS
Genome Biology 2007, 8(6):R101
(5 June 2007)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [F1000 Biology] [Cited on BioMed Central]
5.
36%36%
Research    
Fine scale structural variants distinguish the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura
Macdonald SJ, Long AD
Genome Biology 2006, 7(7):R67
(27 July 2006)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
6.
36%36%
Research article    
Conserved genomic organisation of Group B Sox genes in insects.
McKimmie C, Woerfel G, Russell S
BMC Genetics 2005, 6: 26
(19 May 2005)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
7.
36%36%
Research    
Comparison of the oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) nuclear genes in the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila pseudoobscura and Anopheles gambiae
Tripoli G, D'Elia D, Barsanti P, Caggese C
Genome Biology 2005, 6(2):R11
(31 January 2005)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
8.
36%36%
Minireview    
The latest buzz in comparative genomics
Kulathinal RJ, Hartl DL
Genome Biology 2005, 6(1):201
(4 January 2005)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
9.
36%36%
Research    
Computational identification of developmental enhancers: conservation and function of transcription factor binding-site clusters in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila pseudoobscura
Berman BP, Pfeiffer BD, Laverty TR, Salzberg SL, Rubin GM, Eisen MB, Celniker SE
Genome Biology 2004, 5(9):R61
(20 August 2004)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
10.
36%36%
Research    
The regulatory content of intergenic DNA shapes genome architecture
Nelson CE, Hersh BM, Carroll SB
Genome Biology 2004, 5(4):R25
(15 March 2004)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [F1000 Biology] [Cited on BioMed Central]
11.
36%36%
Review    
Computational prediction of transcription-factor binding site locations
Bulyk ML
Genome Biology 2003, 5(1):201
(23 December 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
12.
36%36%
Research article    
Statistical extraction of Drosophila cis-regulatory modules using exhaustive assessment of local word frequency
Nazina AG, Papatsenko DA
BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4: 65
(22 December 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
13.
36%36%
Minireview    
How many genes in a genome?
Oliver B, Leblanc B
Genome Biology 2003, 5(1):204
(22 December 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]
14.
36%36%
Research article    
Genomic characterization of a repetitive motif strongly associated with developmental genes in Drosophila
Costas J, Vieira CP, Casares F, Vieira J
BMC Genomics 2003, 4: 52
(16 December 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles]
15.
36%36%
Opinion    
Multi-species sequence comparison: the next frontier in genome annotation
Dubchak I, Frazer K
Genome Biology 2003, 4(12):122
(27 November 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
16.
36%36%
Minireview    
Impressive expressions: developing a systematic database of gene-expression patterns in Drosophila embryogenesis
Montalta-He H, Reichert H
Genome Biology 2003, 4(2):205
(28 January 2003)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]
17.
36%36%
Research    
Annotation of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatic genome: a systematic review
Misra S, Crosby MA, Mungall CJ, Matthews BB, Campbell KS, Hradecky P, Huang Y, Kaminker JS, Millburn GH, Prochnik SE, Smith CD, Tupy JL, Whitfield EJ, Bayraktaroglu L, Berman BP, Bettencourt BR, Celniker SE, de Grey ADNJ, Drysdale RA, Harris NL, Richter J, Russo S, Schroeder AJ, Shu SQ, Stapleton M, Yamada C, Ashburner M, Gelbart WM, Rubin GM, Lewis SE
Genome Biology 2002, 3(12):research0083.1 - 0083.22
(31 December 2002)
[Abstract] [Full text] [PDF] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]

This article is also cited by a further 16 articles in PubMed Central

printer friendly 
to  [Help]
Terms and Conditions Privacy statement Information for advertisers Jobs at BMC Contact us
© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.