|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
A comparative analysis of exome capture
Jennifer
S
Parla,
Ivan
Iossifov,
Ian
Grabill,
Mona
S
Spector,
Melissa
Kramer,
W Richard
McCombie
Genome Biology 2011, 12:R97 (29 September 2011)
Abstract | Full text | PDF | PubMed
|
Editor’s summary
The coverage of two solution exome capture kits is compared
|
|
|
2.
|
Comprehensive comparison of three commercial human whole-exome capture platforms
Asan,
Yu
Xu,
Hui
Jiang,
Chris
Tyler-Smith,
Yali
Xue,
Tao
Jiang,
Jiawei
Wang,
Mingzhi
Wu,
Xiao
Liu,
Geng
Tian,
Jun
Wang,
Jian
Wang,
Huangming
Yang,
Xiuqing
Zhang
Genome Biology 2011, 12:R95 (28 September 2011)
Abstract | Full text | PDF | PubMed | Cited on BioMed Central
|
Editor’s summary
A comparison of three human exome-capture platforms shows that NimbleGen's SeqCap EZ gives the best efficacy of exome capture and SNP detection
|
|
|
3.
|
Comparison of solution-based exome capture methods for next generation sequencing
Anna-Maija
Sulonen,
Pekka
Ellonen,
Henrikki
Almusa,
Maija
Lepistö,
Samuli
Eldfors,
Sari
Hannula,
Timo
Miettinen,
Henna
Tyynismaa,
Perttu
Salo,
Caroline
Heckman,
Heikki
Joensuu,
Taneli
Raivio,
Anu
Suomalainen,
Janna
Saarela
Genome Biology 2011, 12:R94 (28 September 2011)
Abstract | Full text | PDF | PubMed
|
Editor’s summary
Roche NimbleGen and Agilent solution-based exome capture kits are compared. NimbleGen kits give more accurate alignments to target regions
|
